We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our website, to show you personalized content and targeted ads, to analyze our website traffic, and to understand where our visitors are coming from.
The conclusion? They might not be beneficial (which conflicts with the findings of the classic ACURASYS trial). But there’s also confounders, such as the depth of sedation or level of PEEP, that might explain it. So who knows?
Important note: This is literally the result of a morning’s Googling to learn to use the software. I haven’t done a full systematic review, accounted for other confounders such as tidal volumes or change in practice over time, nor assessed the trials in any real depth. Though if someone is inspired by this and keen to collaborate on it then get in touch.
A network with 7 AgD studies (arm-based).
------------------------------------------------------- AgD studies (arm-based) ----
Study
ACURASYS
ALVEOLI
EXPRESS
Gainnier 2004
LOVS
ROSE
Villar 2006
Treatment arms
2: nmba + deep sedation + low peep | no nmba + deep sedation + l...
2: std nmba + std sedation + high peep | std nmba + std sedation...
2: std nmba + std sedation + high peep | std nmba + std sedation...
2: nmba + deep sedation + std peep | no nmba + deep sedation + ...
2: std nmba + std sedation + high peep | std nmba + std sedation...
2: nmba + deep sedation + high peep | no nmba + light sedation +...
2: std nmba + std sedation + high peep | std nmba + std sedation...
Outcome type: count
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total number of treatments: 8, in 3 classes
Total number of studies: 7
Reference treatment is: std nmba + std sedation + high peep
Network is disconnected
We have a problem here. Our network is “disconnected”. What does this mean? Lets plot it to see: